PETALUMA CALIFORNIA - PETALUMA Homes and Real Estate For Sale

Article

Who Needs A Time Machine?

Who Needs A Time Machine?
By: Clark Rosen 

 Do you ever wish you could invent a time machine that would take you back just far enough to make those great investments that you missed?  I would like to suggest that your fantasy has come true, if you can only imagine that you have just stepped out of your time machine from the future.

 I was about thirteen years old, riding in the car with my dad through our Los Angeles neighborhood adjacent to the airport, listening to him talk about how much had changed in the last 30 years.  Thousands of homes had been built in the years immediately after World War II, and the pace of commercial development was picking up dramatically. 

 “I remember this area in the 1930’s,” Dad said.  “It was all undeveloped land, most of it for sale at $40 an acre.”

 “Forty bucks an acre!”  I was incredulous.  “Why the heck didn’t you buy some?”  

 His didn’t have to think before answering seriously, “It was too expensive.”

 Dad had become a real estate agent when I was ten, so my view of trends in California real estate is becoming a long one.  I can clearly remember a dinner table story of the prospective buyer who decided not to buy because “no one in his right mind is going to pay $20,000 for a home in Los Angeles.”

 In a 1969 article about escalating home prices, a Business Week reporter wrote:  “The goal of owning a home seems to be getting beyond the reach of more and more Americans.  The typical new house today costs about $28,000.”

 Eight years later, National Business magazine reported:  “The median price of a home today is approaching $50,000 . . . Housing experts predict price rises in the future won’t be that great.”

 After our value slump of the early 1990’s, the San Francisco Examiner opined in 1996:  “A home is where the bad investment is.”

 Historically, it has made very good sense to buy real estate during the “bad times.”  Try to find a Bay Area homeowner who bought one of those bad investments in 1996 and regrets the decision today. 

 The biggest problem I see with the current decline is that so many buying decisions in 2003 to 2006 were based on short-term thinking, relying on the false assumptions that appreciation always continues in a straight line and that big value gains should be made in two or three years.  It is true that the overall trend in California has been upward during the 45 years that I’ve been paying attention, averaging about 6% annually during all that time, including the unprecedented drop since 2005.   But values decline and flatten with some regularity.  If you examine the curve, it looks like a staircase with treads that sag, until 2006, which looks like a few treads were completely broken. 

 The recent downturn demonstrates how important it can be to invest for the long term.  The shorter the holding period, the more critical your timing becomes.  If you'll be holding a real estate investment for at least 15 years, you improve your odds of seeing a decent return regardless of timing.  And if you believe we are at or near a low point in a cycle, your time machine may have brought you to the right moment.

             Clark Rosen writes informative real estate articles for the Argus Courier in Petaluma, California